The Ancient Landmarks

Text: Proverbs 22:28

Series: Restoration Sermons

Date:

Speaker: Ed Rangel

Location: Waupaca Church of Christ

Bible Version: NASB 1995

Sermon Type: Expository

Learning Objectives

By the close of this lesson the hearer should be able to:

1. Explain the historical and legal function of landmarks in ancient Israel and why their removal was cursed.
2. Identify the spiritual landmarks of the church — Scripture as the boundary, obedience as the standard, Christian character as the measure — and explain why moving them is condemned.
3. Distinguish between customs that may legitimately change and principles that are changeless.
4. Name the danger identified in the history of the Christian Church (independent): one departure from the ancient paths called for another.
5. Explain what it means to "stand in the old paths" (Jer. 6:16) and "contend for the faith" (Jude 3) in the present generation.

Thesis

The landmarks that mark the boundaries of God's revealed will cannot be moved without consequence — ancient Israel learned this by law, and the church has learned it by history.

Burden

Every generation inherits landmarks it did not set and cannot reset. The temptation is always to move them — not in a single dramatic act of apostasy, but incrementally, one small adjustment at a time, until the original boundary is no longer visible. This sermon was written in a generation that had already watched one major religious movement drift from the ancient paths. Its warning is not abstract — names were named and trajectories traced. The question for this generation is whether we will hold the boundary line or discover, one quiet compromise at a time, that we have left it far behind.

Introduction

The word "landmark" is not metaphor in this outline — the sermon begins with a concrete object. In ancient times, a landmark was a stone, a post, a tree, or some other fixed marker used to establish the boundary line of property. The science of geometry grew, in part, from the practical necessity of surveying land after the Nile floods erased boundaries each year. The precision of boundaries was not pedantry — it was the difference between a man owning his inheritance and losing it to a neighbor who moved the stone.

The Mosaic law was direct about this. Deuteronomy 19:14 prohibited removing a neighbor's landmark. Deuteronomy 27:17 went further and pronounced a curse on the one who moved it: "Cursed is he who moves his neighbor's boundary mark." Hosea 5:10 applied the image to Judah's leaders: "The princes of Judah have become like those who move a boundary; on them I will pour out My wrath like water." These were not ceremonial concerns — they were structural to the justice of a society in which each family held its portion of the land as a divine grant.

The sermon moves that image from the land into the church.

I. History of the Use of Landmarks (Deut. 19:14)

The landmark in ancient Israel was a legal instrument. Each tribe received its territory by divine allotment (Num. 26:52-56; Josh. 13-19). The stone that marked the edge of that territory was not a cultural convention — it was the boundary of a God-given inheritance. Moving it was therefore not simply theft; it was a violation of the divine order of possession.

The curse in Deuteronomy 27:17 was pronounced publicly, by all the people, at Mount Ebal. Every Israelite heard it. Every Israelite knew that the boundary stone was under divine protection. The fact that Judah's leaders were later condemned for the same offense (Hos. 5:10) shows how even those entrusted with guarding the landmarks are capable of moving them for advantage.

The structure of the law here is instructive: God set the boundary, the law protected the boundary, and the curse enforced the protection. Three layers of defense for a single stone. This was not excessive — it was proportionate to the importance of what the stone represented. A people who moved boundaries casually were a people who had no stable inheritance.

II. Spiritual Application

The transfer from geography to theology is not forced — it is demanded by the logic of the New Testament itself. The same God who said "Do not move the ancient boundary which your fathers have set" (Prov. 22:28) is the God who declared the gospel permanently fixed at the moment of its revelation.

Paul stated the principle with maximum force: "But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed! As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, he is to be accursed!" (Gal. 1:8-9). The repetition is deliberate — Paul says it twice in consecutive verses to make certain no one reads the first occurrence as hyperbole. The gospel as originally delivered is the landmark. No preacher, no council, no tradition, no new revelation from heaven may move it.

Revelation 22:18-19 gives the same warning at the close of the entire canon: "If anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are written in this book; and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life." Add to the boundary: cursed. Remove from the boundary: cursed. The geometry of God's Word has been fixed.

Isaiah 5:20 identifies the intellectual and moral move that makes boundary-shifting possible: calling evil good and good evil, putting darkness for light and light for darkness. Every departure from the ancient landmarks requires this reframing — the old path must be called narrow-mindedness, the old standard must be called legalism, the old confession must be called mere tradition. The monument is not removed until the eye is first convinced it is in the wrong place.

III. Landmarks of Custom

Not everything inherited is a landmark in the binding sense. The outline makes the distinction carefully: some customs should change; some should not.

The test is whether anything better has replaced the custom. If a practice can be improved — if a clearer, more effective, more scriptural way is available — then the old form should give way. No one argues that quill pens are more faithful to the first century than printed Bibles. Custom that serves the principle is appropriately adapted when a better means of service becomes available.

But if nothing better is available — if the change is change for its own sake, or for accommodation to culture, or for the appearance of progress — then the custom should be left alone. Moving a boundary stone that works is not improvement; it is confusion.

The deeper point is that principles do not change at all. Honesty is a landmark. Truthfulness is a landmark. Justice is a landmark. These are not customs — they are the irreducible moral structure of the created order, grounded in the character of God himself. No generation has outgrown the need for them; no culture has successfully replaced them with something better. They remain where God set them.

IV. Landmarks of the Church

The outline identifies five specific landmarks that define the boundary of the church as originally constituted.

Primary obedience to the gospel. The church exists as a called-out community of those who have obeyed the gospel. The order is specific: hear, believe, repent, confess, be baptized for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38). This is not one tradition among others — it is the founding condition of membership. Any alteration of the conditions of entry moves this landmark.

Standard of Christian character. The church is not merely a collection of persons who have obeyed the gospel — it is a community being formed into the image of Christ. The standard is not cultural competence or social respectability; it is the fruit of the Spirit, the obedience of faith, the love of God and neighbor. Moving this landmark produces a church indistinguishable from the world around it.

Bring in no new dogmas. The creed of the Restoration Movement is the New Testament. When a human system of doctrine — however ancient, however widely accepted — is elevated to the level of Scripture or used as the test of fellowship alongside Scripture, a new boundary stone has been set in a place God never authorized.

Stand in the old paths (Jer. 6:16). "Thus says the LORD, 'Stand by the ways and see and ask for the ancient paths, where the good way is, and walk in it; and you will find rest for your souls.'" The people in Jeremiah's day replied: "We will not walk in it." The result was judgment. The old paths are old because they are the original paths — the ones walked by the apostles, the ones that lead to the destination the Lord has prepared.

Contend earnestly for the faith (Jude 3). The word "contend" (epagōnizomai) is an athletic term — it describes the intense, straining effort of a competitor who will not concede. The faith was delivered "once for all" — hapax, a word of finality. It is not being delivered progressively or updated with each generation. It was given whole. The task is to guard it whole.

V. Pioneers

The pioneers of the Restoration Movement — Alexander Campbell, Barton W. Stone, Walter Scott, and those who labored with them — did something specific: they planted landmarks of obedience. They returned to the New Testament as the only rule of faith and practice. They rejected human creeds as tests of fellowship. They preached baptism for the remission of sins when most of Protestantism had abandoned it. They did not invent these doctrines — they recovered them from the text.

The generation that inherits those landmarks did not set them. It must not remove them. The faithfulness required of a generation is not to innovate but to hold what was delivered. "We should not remove the landmarks" is not a counsel of timidity — it is the recognition that the boundaries of God's revelation are not ours to redraw.

The outline identifies a specific and sobering historical example: the Christian Church (Instrumental). Beginning from the same roots as the Churches of Christ, the Christian Church introduced first the instrument in worship, then other innovations. One departure called for another. The first concession to culture made the second easier, and the second made the third necessary. The trajectory moved away from the ancient paths one step at a time until the original starting point was no longer visible.

The need of faithful men today is not for cleverness or cultural adaptability — it is for the courage to stand where the boundary stones are planted and refuse to move them regardless of the pressure to do so.

Application

Three tests this sermon provides for any proposed change in teaching or practice:

Is it written? If the authority for what is being proposed cannot be found in Scripture — in explicit command, approved example, or necessary inference — then a landmark is being moved. The silence of Scripture is not permission; it is prohibition.

Is it better? If an existing practice serves a biblical principle and no improvement is available, changing it accomplishes nothing except removing a familiar marker. Not all change is improvement; some change is simply erosion.

Where does this lead? The historical example warns that the trajectory of a single concession cannot be evaluated only in the moment of the concession. The question is not merely "Is this first step acceptable?" but "If we take this step, where does the path lead?" One departure calls for another because each departure creates a new baseline from which the next one is measured.

Conclusion

"Do not move the ancient boundary which your fathers have set" (Prov. 22:28). Proverbs attributes this instruction to wisdom, not merely to law. It is the observation of someone who has watched what happens when boundaries are moved — who has seen the inheritance lost, the community fractured, the path become untraceable.

The ancient landmarks of the church are: the authority of Scripture alone, the gospel as the condition of salvation, the New Testament as the pattern for worship and organization, and the standard of Christian character. These were not set by the Restoration pioneers — they were set by the apostles under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. The pioneers only rediscovered them and replanted the stones after centuries of drift.

Our task is simpler than theirs was: hold the line. The stones are in place. Stand where they stand.

Invitation

If you have been standing at a distance from the ancient paths — hearing them described, acknowledging their authority, but not yet walking in them — this is the moment to ask for them. The invitation of Jeremiah 6:16 is also the invitation of the gospel: "Stand by the ways and see and ask for the ancient paths, where the good way is, and walk in it; and you will find rest for your souls."

The good way begins with full obedience. Believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. Repent of the life that has been organized around something less than him. Confess his name before these witnesses. Be baptized for the remission of your sins (Acts 2:38). The rest he promises is not ease — it is the stability of standing on ground that does not move.

Word Study

Scripture Interlock Table

---

Converted from H. Leo Boles, Outline 85. Primary text: Proverbs 22:28 (stated by Boles). Doctrinal audit: Restoration Movement hermeneutic fully applied — Scripture as the only landmark, no additions or subtractions; add/subtract/substitute principle stated with Gal. 1:8-9 and Rev. 22:18-19; Jer. 6:16 ("old paths") and Jude 3 ("contend for the faith") retained from Boles; specific historical example of the Christian Church (instrumental) used as Boles intended — as the cautionary case of "one departure calls for another"; invitation retains full obedient response (Acts 2:38). No OCR errors in source.